Policies, regulations and institutions are among key tools for dealing with pollutants and climate change in the Arctic. Because the region and many activities taking place here are strongly influenced by global or external dynamics, all levels of law and policy have to be taken into account.
We need to understand regulatory and policy frameworks to be able to discuss available options for Arctic communities and to think more holistically about the future of pollution impact and control. As researchers, we also have to try to exert influence on policy-making, so that our findings not only enhance the understanding of Arctic changes, but also translate to a shift in decision-makers’ way of thinking about the challenges in the region.
For somebody who focuses on a higher level of policies, whether we talk about EU or global frameworks, concrete effects and local implications of measures and rules are often difficult to grasp. ICEBERG allows me to consider the relevance of these policies within Arctic communities. It is an amazing experience to talk with people in North Iceland about their struggles, success stories, and ideas, and to better understand how these are influenced by shifting multilevel governance landscapes.
The multidisciplinary nature of ICEBERG is for me also a major asset. Experts working on policy and legal issues are far too often disconnected from the broader social science research. This has adverse effects on the relation of their insights to what is happening in the real world.
I have been working in a multidisciplinary setting my whole career and, in general, Arctic research tends to be more cross-cutting than other fields. Nonetheless, interacting with colleagues in ICEBERG is still both challenging and rewarding, expanding my way of thinking one delivery at a time.